American Youth Culture

This is a list of characteristics made by sociologists about the state of America’s youth in relation to religion. This is a helpful resource for youth ministers and those involved in youth ministry. Some of the things they noted on the list is quite surprising. Though, just thinking about the youth these days, just shouldn’t surprise me. Religion at large as observed by sociology of religion.

1) U.S. youth are not irreligious or a-religious. They are religious.

Religion is a significant presence in many young adults. Most have not drop out of their religious congregations. They are regular participants. Many asserts faith is important in their lives and have influence on their moral views. But they have a hard time articulating their beliefs. Categories they have are influenced by culture.

2) Very few youth are not involved in a spiritual quest.

Most teenagers allow the right to others to pursue quest, but very few do it themselves.

3) Teenage religiosity is conventional.

They are not rebellious. They are quite content to follow in their parents footsteps. Most youth feel positive about religion. They talk about the positive and benefits to individual and society.
When it comes to teenagers and religion, they are happy to go along with the flow.

4) Youth are not religiously diverse.

The diversity represented by teens and adults right now is same as it was in prior generations. The vast majority identify themselves as Christians. Most of the non-christians are nominal, non-religious, mormons, Jewish. The world says Americans are vastly diverse in religion, but that is false, we are clearly Christian.

5) Religious vitality and strength

When it comes to religious vitality and strength, mormon teenagers appear to have healthy balance of faith and life, then comes conservative protestant youths, mainline protestant teens, catholic, jewish, then non-religious.

6) The greatest influence

The single most important social influence on spiritual and religious lives is the parents. Stereotype, we think youth pastor, mentors, culture, grandparents, etc were influential, but it was the parents. This should influence how we do church.

Note: You might be the most dynamic influential pastor in the world, but the parents are still the key.

The strongest predictor of a child’s spiritual life will mirror what their parents spiritual life looks like.

7) Second greatest influence:

Supply side dynamic youth – the greater number of religious programs, relationships, activities, challenges, opportunities- the more vested they will be to remain in religious. When religious communities are not invested in youth, the youth are most likely not going to be invested in their faith. Churches will get back what they invest.

What should we do? Pleasantly overwhelm them.

8) Deep religious practice being mimicked. Parrot effect. Unreflective nature – apathy begets apathy.

Subjective consciousness level, youth understanding is very weak regarding faith. Most U.S. youth have a very difficult time explaining what they believe, what it means, and its implications. They reflect their parents. If their parents are biblical unreflectiven, that would be mimicked as well. For them religion is important but not a priority. Value but not invested.

When preaching or teaching. Repeat things over and over again. People do not listen. Boil everything down to a sentence. And repeat this sentence. Illustrate. Illustrate. Illustrate. Find something to get their attention.

Do you want to be a seminary professor or love people? Right exogesis but boring, or getting people attention with illustration with good theology? Jesus preached using parables, after parables. Make the text as alive as possible.

9) The religion of America reflected in the youth: MTD – Moralistic, Therapeutic, Deism.

This is the mainstream religious faith of the youth are individualistic, consumer, capitalistic society. Deistic – distant god with minimal involvement, but be moral. Moralism – be good to be happy. Therapeutic – focuses on one’s own subjective happiness. MTD is the religion of the day

10) Cultural and social forces shape their lives

Their lives are shaped by cultural and social forces of therapeutic individualism, mass consumerism, digital communication revolution, scientism, structural disconnect with world of adults, and the only connection with adults are adult problems like divorce,

11) Outcome: Religion makes a positive difference.

Despite religion is weak in subjective consciousness, most teens can hardly articulate coherent, unfocus background in social life, many cultural forces that try to undermine.

Observation that sizable and significant differences in a variety of life outcomes of religious teens in the U.S. Highly religious teens are doing more than non/less-religious teens. Religious life leads to better more constructive life contrary to the secular.
Conclusion

As adults, we need to look at children not as aliens. We need to look at the generation gaps as superficial differences. Contemporary youth have bought into the mainstream social system. They are well socialized to enjoy the consumerist benefits of U.S. society. Most problems and issues children face are directly linked to adult world problems. They cherish their relationships with the adult-world ties. They don’t need to be segmented out. Religious congregations have a unique role to strengthen ties between adults and teenagers. All need to be involved. Embracing youth. Your investments are not immediate, payoffs are not immediate.

Sources:

- Wade Clark – Group spiritual marketplace,

- Withnells – America religious diversity

- Christian Smith – Soul searching.

Christ and Culture

Quick overview of Richard Neibuhr, theologian of the Cold-War, German reformed neo-orthodox. Culture is derived from the language of gardening – the taste that rule the culture, elite, pop-culture, etc.

Neo-orthodoxy tries to capture reformation back from the liberal orthodoxy (Fatherhood of God and brotherhood of man). We need to return to the God of scripture. Neo-orthodoxy (must be brought back to the reformation, uphold God’s transcendence, man’s sinfulness, personal experience, revelation is God revealing himself in Christ, and must be approached with faith).

Culture is fluid, so Christians should take temperature of where it is headed. Niebuhr teaches five options as how Christ interacts with Culture:

1. Christ against culture
What does Jerusalem have to do with Athens? – Tertullian
Antagonistic towards culture
Sectarianism – Tertullian, Kierkegaard, Anabaptists

2. Christ of culture
Jesus gets absorbed in the culture, Classical liberalism (fatherhood of God and brotherhood of man)
Accommodation of Christ to culture
Gnostics, Sadduccees, Liberation theology

3. Christ above culture – synthesis
Instead of antagonism, or accommodation, this one is synthesis.
Fundamental issue is the Christ and the world, but between God and humans,
World is not cursed, not in opposition to God. Leans towards #2
Thomas Aquinas, Aristotle, faith and reason, relationship between faith and philosophy
Leads towards social conservatism and Christ of culture

4. Christ and Culture in PARADOX
Instead of synthesis, dualism – two spheres that don’t relate
Rejects Christ above culture to synthesis, rules out the transformation of culture,
City of God and City of Man, dualism
Reinholt, Luther, Apostle Paul

5. Christ the transformer of culture
Now but not yet. Do not suffer under the illusion that this world will transform to paradise but are eager to see God’s hand in advancement of science, arts, medicine, etc.
Don’t stand on the sidelines and watch, they want to be God’s agents of reform around him. Redemption extends to culture not just individuals. God is king and sovereign over culture
John, Calvin, Wesley, Augustine
Christians transforms culture, but culture transforms Christians as well.

Response

Resident Aliens – Hauerwas – #5 collapsing to #2 constantine social strategy, while we are aliens transform this land
Alien – Volf – The church doesn’t prop up the government, keeps the integrity of the church in faith, morality. Paradox: one’s best in changing the world, when one’s not of the world.
Kuyperian approach – Neo-Calvinists, rediscover Calvin in Dutch theology – Antithesis #5, #4, #1 – antagonism between Christian and non-Christian – common grace, God gave man common grace to live lives… momentary synchronistic

who runs your church?

The Devil wants to run your church

Quoting EM Bounds:

Bounds begins by asking this question: What is the truest measure of a church’s strength? His answer is, “True strength lies in the vital godliness of the people. The aggregate personal holiness of the members of each church is the only true measure of strength. Any other test offends God, dishonors Christ, grieves the Holy Spirit, and degrades religion.” To put it another way, the strength of any church is the work of the Spirit in conforming its members to the life of Christ. However, Satan’s strategy is to lure us into thinking that our strength lies elsewhere—not in the inward things of the Spirit, but in things that are external and superficial. “One of the schemes of Satan,” Bounds writes, “is to establish a wrong estimate of church strength.” A church is considered strong, he goes on to say, “when its membership is large, when it has social position, financial resources; when ability, learning, and eloquence fill the pulpit, and when the pews are filled by fashion, intelligence, money and influence.”

the guest

she came to our house, but she didn’t know the rules.

you’re supposed to be nice to everyone. you’re supposed to respect us… you’re supposed to wait until everyone is ready before eating… you’re supposed to look good… you’re supposed to be polite… you’re supposed to be proper…

but she didn’t know the rules… she came in, looking for food. she was smelly, dirty… she was poor and didn’t look nice… she was rude… she didn’t care what others thought… she was noisy…

because she didn’t know the rules… no one talked with her or got to know her… we didn’t know how to treat her… we ignored her, pretended she wasn’t there… because she didn’t know the rules…

we asked her to leave because she didn’t know the rules….

but she was His guest and the Lord invited her back…

because we didn’t know the rules…

church growth

been thinking recently about growth in general. how do we as a church grow? how do we as christians grow?

the common answer is that God does the growing. so what do we as christians do? plant the seeds, water the seeds, prune the leaves, cut off dead branches… how do we mature? how do we change from immature to mature? how do we grow from young adults to elders?
God. 1 corinthians 3

stepping out in faith; taking on of more responsibilities is a step; open to being stretched, challenged, and used; serving; being mentored, pruned…

how does the church grow? when the body is united with christ… we cut off those that aren’t growing… we prune those areas that are growing. we remain in Him… john 15